I will start the answer, and I will let Paul and John complete it.
Part 5 is a crucial part of the act and a tricky part of the act at the same time. It is a part where there is a lot of work that has to be done to make sure we have the right science on which to base judgment on whatever we have to do. We have to make sure that whenever we are looking at a substance, we really have the broad overview of what has to be taken into account, but if there is reason for concern, we have the capacity to put forward the steps so that we can prevent doing the work.
Correctly, the two departments are working diligently together to make sure we have the best process forward. We have learned from the first few years of working together with that part of the act, and it's clear to us that we have to improve the work that is being done so we can really have a systematic implementation.
That part is crucial for a lot of the work we have to do, but without it there are still other provisions; the act has been made with a collage of different elements. So it's one that for us is a key feature of what CEPA is providing to be able to address a lot of the substances to which citizens are exposed.
I'm sure Mr. Glover and Mr. Moffet would like to speak.