Thank you very much for coming. It's good to see some of you in a new incarnation, as far as I'm concerned.
I've read through the act, and I'd like to begin by asking if it would be possible to describe part 5 of CEPA as the sort of controlling “brain”, if you like. What you're defining under part 5 are substances that are dangerous, toxic, are a priority and all the rest of it.
Without part 5 you wouldn't be able to deal with emergencies or assess pollution risk and everything else, so if there are problems of definition, is part 5 the most crucial part of the act without which nothing can really happen?