Actually what I would like to do is to leave that there and move on, because I know that time is of the essence here.
Mr. Moffet described two different approaches, which he characterized as dranocian versus efficient. I'm wondering how efficient the act has been if we've only completed five pollution prevention plans. If we still rank as badly as we do--out of 29 industrialized countries, we're 29th in terms of releases of volatile organic compounds, 27 out of 28 for sulphur dioxide, and so on--I'm wondering if one of the flaws of the act is precisely because there's too much “may” and not enough “shall”.