That's a simple question.
I think that the act, to be frank, in my view, is as efficient as the departments have been able to make it be. The rate at which we're able to assess substances.... The science is complex. We need to move with other jurisdictions. We don't want to do work unnecessarily, so if we find another country doing something, how do we align?
That's not an attempt to be defensive, but there has been, and you'll hear about this.... The level with which the departments have been resourced to undertake this work is a long agenda. When people hear it's a 50-year assessment agenda or a 25-year assessment agenda, they get frustrated. I think the short answer is we have been as efficient as we possibly can be, given the resources we have. We have taken creative approaches, approaches no other jurisdictions are doing. We're trying to look at classes of substances rather than one at a time. So we are making some adjustments in what it is we're doing in order to be able to move as efficiently as we possibly can.