First and foremost, there are a number of ways that things get onto the department's work plans. We nominate things that we feel from a science point of view are important. We are working to make those publicly available and accessible. So we consult on that. Regarding the categorization results, we've been working with industry and NGOs to let them know what we think the priorities are.
The other thing is that people can ask the ministers to look at something specifically. Citizens have that right, and that is something that can be incorporated into the work plans. That is another way into CEPA. The ministers have the obligation to look at that and say whether they feel that is more or less important than some of the other things that are already on the work plan. But that is a definite option that is available and has been used.
So whether that's a citizen or a researcher, if somebody has a concern, they can make that concern known to the ministers. They will then determine whether that is applicable under CEPA or another piece of legislation. If CEPA is the right place, we can be asked to look at it. That would apply to any substance that could be regulated under CEPA.