Also, when I look at page 9, I guess a couple of things jump out at me. Perhaps committee members would suffer through these with me.
Under areas of intervention, I see “Disposal at sea”. Of course, I immediately look at your chart and say “enforcement”; I'm thinking Bill C-15. Where does CEPA fit with something like that?
Then I look at “International movement of all wastes”, and I think about Toronto.
Then I hear you say that the entire bill should be “citizen friendly”, and I think about the two issues I mentioned as examples of how CEPA could be friendly. You'd be talking about things that people care about--about air, about water, about things that go in our oceans, about the million seabirds that show up dead in Newfoundland every year, about the 416 truckloads of garbage that go across the U.S. border every day. These are the kinds of things, it seems to me, that, put into CEPA and talked about in CEPA, would certainly make it much more user friendly and let Canadians communicate with you much better about that.
That's just something I picked up on as you talked about citizen-friendly legislation.
To our guests, thank you for being here. I'm sure we'll have you back.
Thank you.
The meeting is adjourned.