Advocacy—I'm not sure this is the right term. We certainly try to promote good management practices, be it financial management, human resource management, environmental management. We certainly have a role, I think, in education on issues, but all the work we do is based on the audit work we do. We will not comment on government policies.
If I can take an example, which I think is an example we use quite frequently when we explain that we don't have a policy—we can't comment on policy. When we did our audits on the firearms registry, we never commented about the policy of having a registry. We talked about the management and the implementation of that policy. To us, there's a very clear distinction. When we talk about, for example, Kyoto, it is because government has signed, there is a commitment in place, and we audit to that commitment, but we would not go out and make a comment as to whether that commitment is appropriate or not. So we start with the establishment of policy by government and then look to see, are commitments being met, and is policy being implemented as was intended by Parliament?