Okay. I'm going to come to the practice over a decade, as well as all of the reports that have been issued that were from time to time critical of our government, critical of the new government, critical of the bureaucracy itself, and so on and so forth. I'm just trying to match the expectations gap in society particularly, Mr. Desautels. Most Canadians want to see their governments' feet held to the fire on this.
The position has evolved; the role has evolved; we live in a very competitive communication world. Don't you think--and both of you can comment--that the independence of this kind of position with the strength and advocacy role would go some distance in holding any government's feet more immediately to the fire? Don't you think this would help Canadians understand more about what is actually going on and what is not going on? I'm trying to get anything that would suggest this is not a good idea; I can't find it in the testimony from either of you.