I think you're bringing in another dimension. If you're saying that as the government is making an announcement or laying out plans of what it's going to do down the road, I don't think it would be proper for an auditor or, I would say, even a stand-alone commissioner to get involved in the middle of the debate between members of Parliament at that point. So certainly we would not do that.
We will certainly do it, though, once a program has been approved and it's working, to see whether or not the government actually delivers what it said it would deliver with that program. That's fair game. It's the same with other key questions. One example I could use is the gun registry. You would not have wanted the Auditor General or another agent of Parliament to get involved in that debate at the time about whether or not it was a good thing to do. I think once the program is in place, whether or not it's achieving what it was supposed to achieve is a subject of a legitimate audit.