At our meeting, Ms. Fraser explained to us that the Commissioner of the Environment had previously written a number of reports. Until the moment the events concerning Ms. Gélinas occurred, I don't think anyone had any criticism to make of the situation, the quality or the direction of the reports, and so on. We can unanimously say that the work was well done. At no time in the past 10 years was any problem of interference, independence or anything whatever reported. I believe that all members from the parties agree that the work was done.
Today, we are having a debate to determine whether the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development should continue to report to the Auditor General. As Bernard said, I don't feel very comfortable making such an important decision too quickly. I don't see the urgency of that. Furthermore, a Commissioner of the Environment has already been appointed to replace Ms. Gélinas. We should take the time to see how that goes. I don't see any urgency because the work is being done. History shows that the work has always been done. So I don't see why we should move so quickly.
Objectively, I'm not making a scene, except that I find it hard to understand why this is suddenly urgent.