I have a question here. I ask the members, and I'm not sure what kind of an answer I'll get—and it would have been good to ask our witnesses here today, too—if in fact there had not been a seemingly somewhat abrupt completion to Ms. Gélinas' role there, would we even be having a discussion like this today?
As the members opposite have indicated, we really don't have a very clear picture, but if in two or three months from now we have a better or clearer understanding of what that was all about, at such point as we do....
Up until this point, nobody seemed to be raising the issues here. We've heard her several times and actually seemed pleased with her work. I think she has been non-partisan. She has criticized the Conservatives. She has heavily criticized the Liberals of the past here as well. So I guess on that balance of things she's done a fair-minded, objective kind of job.
I didn't hear a big hue and cry at all before, frankly. But I don't know. Maybe in this vacuum of knowledge and not knowing what all transpired here and what prompted this, all of a sudden now we have this coming forward. So I'm wondering if some of us are going to have a little egg on our faces and feel a little foolish a couple of months from now when maybe we have some better understanding of what this completion of her role was all about.