First of all, I want to make it clear that it's not an 85% reduction in emissions. It's on an intensity basis. The number I've shown in this graph is emissions going down and production going up; that's how we get the 85% number.
How big an issue are shutdowns? That has been a factor in this, but I don't think a major one. The graphs you have are probably too small to see, but starting at 2000, there's another curve. We actually reviewed this issue. We have a memorandum of understanding with the federal, Ontario, and Alberta governments. British Columbia is about to join, and there are also environmental groups that participate. They asked us that question a year ago, and we worked with them in answering it. We came up with the solution of the other line in these charts that tries to show from 2000—we went back that far—what the situation was when we take out companies that are no longer CCPA members because they shut down operations.
Obviously, our improvement isn't as dramatic because part of the improvement is related to plant shutdowns, but I think the improvement still continues. This is an issue we looked at with a stakeholder group and are trying to portray in our graphs.
I hope that answers the questions.