So let me then put the question this way.
When someone comes to see me and says that the science performed by Health Canada is faulty because it has not included this ascribed notion of the “cumulative”, what do they mean by that? What does an ENGO coming to me and saying that the science is inconclusive: “These assessments, however, failed to include exposure from consumer products...no cumulative assessments of these phthalates was done...”, what are they talking about?