Thank you, Mr. Chair.
And thank you for your comments.
There are a couple of things I want to pursue a little bit. It's interesting that when we go through this bill next week to decide what we're going to do with it, the evidence that's been given on both sides of this issue is pretty tough to get your head around.
I'm going to go to page 4 of Ms. Stanley's presentation first--it's interesting that it happens on page 4 of both your presentations, Ms. Stanley's as well as Ms. Axmith's--where you use words like “but not those intended to be placed in the mouth”, and “banned by Bill C-307 and have generally found no significant risk”.
And then in Ms. Axmith's presentation it included, “DBP is not commonly used”, and then “soft plastic toys”.
To Mr. Warawa's point in terms of all these things ending up going in the mouth and everything else, I'm a little bit concerned that the words you're using here do not give me a great level of comfort that there is not an impact. Those words you're using just concern me.
When I'm looking at this bill next week, how can you allay my concerns that children are not going to be impacted by this?