Mr. Chair, I understand the parliamentary secretary's intention here. There are other aspects of this bill, DBP and BBP in particular, as well as other components, that require the minister to be involved. So while he's talking about the Food and Drugs Act in particular with respect to DEHP, I don't see why striking the minister completely from the bill would make a great deal of sense, because there are ministerial authorities that still need to be there. There are products and chemicals he has jurisdiction over, particularly in terms of listing and authorities to do a redesignation.
So I understand the intention of being specific about this, but striking the minister from the bill entirely doesn't—
Maybe he can clarify.