Mr. Chair, this will be an initial reaction because I am not involved in the agreement that has been made between the two parties, and perhaps even with the third party -- I do not know because its representative has not yet spoken. The interesting aspect of what has been presented to us is first of all clause 3 that specifies the precautionary principle. I think that this is an interesting step forward that could even be written into other acts. I think that it is a very interesting and very important point.
Secondly, in clause 6, I feel that a balance has been achieved in the spirit of the amendment, in the sense that it also allows us to recognize that there can be risks. As I understand it, everything must be spelled out in the labelling, but it does not prevent people's access to medical treatment. So, with the transparency, the information given to medical technicians, and the desire to make sure that the public is informed, I think that an appropriate balance has been written into the amendments that are before us. But we can perhaps talk about that when we move to clause-by-clause study of the bill.