I think there are probably two separate issues there. One is the interest of tightening up the language, talking about taking steps, and I don't think we have a problem with that. That seems fairly straightforward.
In terms of the list, I would go back to seek some clarification about what a replacement list would entail. In general, we wouldn't be making recommendations on the use of an individual medical device over another individual medical device. That really is the practice of medicine. So an individual practitioner would make that risk assessment based on the patient they had in front of them.
So I just need some clarification on what a replacement list would really entail and what the implications of that would be.