Evidence of meeting #55 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Sue Milburn-Hopwood  Director, Risk Management Bureau, Department of Health
Mike MacPherson  Procedural Clerk
Jean-Sébastien Rochon  Counsel, Department of Justice
Supriya Sharma  Associate Director General, Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Department of Health

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Now we're on page 15.3, which will be new clause 3.3 and not clause 7, but remember, we split that. We've pretty much had the discussion and I believe Mr. Cullen did remove that. Of course, we made that 24 months in the French translation.

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

I so move.

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Mr. Warawa moves it.

Questions? Mr. McGuinty.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

I want to be absolutely clear here, I'll read it in English:

The Minister of the Environment and the Minister of Health shall, within 24 months after the coming into force of this Act, reassess

Does that mean we'll have completed the reassessment?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Yes. We're getting a nod, yes.

1:15 p.m.

Director, Risk Management Bureau, Department of Health

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

Should it not say “have completed a reassessment”?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

In your motion, did I hear you say that?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

You certainly did, Chair.

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

That's what I thought.

It has been a long meeting.

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

(On clause 4)

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

I'm advising you that we should defeat clause 4, because we've made so many changes that clause 4 doesn't fit anything anymore.

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

David McGuinty Liberal Ottawa South, ON

The original clause 4?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Clause 4 is part of the original bill, so the original clause 4.

Now NDP-4 is an amendment to what is still in existence, clause 4. Where is that one? NDP-4 on page 16 is where we are.

If Nathan withdraws, then obviously we can--

1:15 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I'm not sure about that. Would withdrawing not allow that clause 4 still stands?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

No. We then have to strike clause 4 from the bill.

1:15 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

So whether we do that, whether it's changing the—

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

I think we need to deal with your amendment first.

1:15 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Sure.

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

If you don't move that, then we can go on to the next—

1:15 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Sure.

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

So NDP-4 is not moved.

Now the committee needs to take a look at clause 4. We need a motion.

1:15 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Essentially we're seeking to remove it, correct?

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Yes. We want to remove it.

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I move that clause 4 be withdrawn.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

What we're doing is calling clause 4. If it's defeated it's removed, and if it's supported then it stays there.