This is the 10% disagreement in terms of a difference of opinion as to what was heard from witnesses.
For committee members, for ease of understanding, there are three phthalates in play here--DEHP, BBP and DBP. If you follow beyond this--and I'm not going to refer to it any deeper than this--we have two NDP amendments that are similar to this one presented by the government, but they include all three phthalates instead of just the one.
So for ease of principle so that we can have the debate, essentially, or the difference of opinion between committee members, if we don't amend, do we--not friendly--subamend?