So it really depends on how far the carbon dioxide has to be transported through the pipeline and where it's going to be going. The example we have in the studies and reports I've read say that British Columbia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan are an ideal area.
But as we consider carbon capture and storage as one of the many tools to deal with climate change in Canada, and Dr. Keith talked about that, how feasible is that technology for other parts of Canada, and what happens to the cost if we do not have geological formations to be able to store it deep underground?
Take Ontario, for example. If we require carbon capture and storage.... We have coal-fired generating plants in Ontario that need to be shut down and replaced, and that's the debate. If the new plants are required to have carbon capture and storage, which I believe is a good suggestion, how does it work out? What are the costs now that we have to build that infrastructure in new plants and capture it?
What happens to the costs, then, when we're moving away from B.C., Alberta, and Saskatchewan into Ontario? Do you have any idea?