But why subsidize that technology development if there's benefit to the industry itself to go out and sell that technology abroad?
Is it not government's job to try to assign, or incorporate, or internalize the cost of this pollution—which we're now calling pollution—into the business decisions that you folks make and the upstream sector makes, rather than subsidize it?
Nowhere in your bottom line is there any factor for CO 2 right now, and EnCana would be the same. There's nowhere to look at the spreadsheets and find out what it's costing the companies right now, because there is no cost to it in Canada.
Maybe I'll direct my question to Dr. Keith and come back to you in a second.
With intensity-based targets, I'm trying to understand how it is that companies are going to make those capital investments not knowing what the cost of business is. Can you explain why companies are going to shell out hundreds of millions of dollars if they don't know what a tonne of CO 2 actually costs?