I have a quick question around the monitoring acts, and this is for Mr. Reynen. I'm looking at an IEA report. What is the length of time required in terms of monitoring to be certain this is a viable system? They talk about 7,000 years. This is not exactly a left-wing organization. These folks are pretty conservative in their outlook on energy.
If they're saying that an acceptable level to limit risk is that we need to monitor some thousands of years into the future, if we monitor for 50 years and then it starts leaking and we've gone away and gone on to something else and it leaks for the next little while.... The scale and scope you folks have been talking about is absolutely enormous. Are we not running the risk of putting all our eggs in one basket if we're not willing to monitor nearly in perpetuity?