That's my point. So it would be legitimate, then, to take away from 49 megatonnes, 70% of the target, which leaves us 14 megatonnes. Also under the plan we could take away an additional 5 megatonnes for a special R and D technology fund in 2010. Is that correct? That would bring us down from 14 megatonnes to 9 megatonnes. Then there's also an early action credit fund, which is a further 5 megatonnes. So under a scenario that is entirely plausible under the rules of the game as constructed in the plan, we could be down to 4 megatonnes. Is that correct?
On May 16th, 2007. See this statement in context.