Let me move on to another question then.
Over the weekend you stated that the main reason for the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in Canada between 2004 and 2005 was the reduced reliance in Ontario on coal-fired electricity. In particular, you pointed out that nuclear power production increased that year, and as a result of that decision made by the Ontario government, the summary of emissions report states that:
The flattening of the growth curve between 2003 and 2005 is due primarily to a significant reduction in emissions from electricity production—coupled with reduced demand for heating fuels due to warmer winters and a reduced rate of increase in fossil fuel production.
I want to ask you why the department attributed the reduction of greenhouse gases in Canada to reduced reliance on coal-fired electricity when in fact there was a 10.5% increase in emissions from Ontario's plants in 2005. Are you aware that the whole of Canada's 23 largest coal-fired electric stations increased their emissions by 3.7%, or 3.8 megatonnes? How did that benefit Canada's emissions?