I'd like to explain that. I think we came forward with the architecture of a regulatory regime when we announced our “Turning the Corner” document. We talked about the short term, the medium term, the long term, and various compliance options. What the provinces asked us, what industry asked us, what environmental groups asked us, and what health groups asked us was to work with them in putting the meat on the bone.
I'll speak directly about the domestic offset system. We would like to develop a domestic offset system in collaboration with all the groups I've mentioned, with municipalities. It will be a hard system. We will be coming forward with further details, as we committed to do.
I guess you are either blamed for not having all of the details from day one or you're criticized for not having enough consultation. I think the consultation with the provinces is absolutely imperative. All of the provinces have asked to actively participate in those consultations. I think a domestic offset system can have great advantages, whether it's capping the methane at municipal dumps or working cooperatively with real, hard, and tangible offsets. We'll be working on that in the days and months to come.
I do know the Pembina Institute is a very well-respected group with a lot of very smart people. I also know that they helped write the Liberal plan. They're naturally going to defer to the plan they helped author.