Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would say to Mr. Bigras, who just spoke, that what people are stuck on at this point is the fact that part of the motion is to have a particular meeting with respect to the G-8, and thereafter on a particular date.
Please also keep in mind, colleagues, that part of the motion was in terms of how that would be set up and done. It was about having the sherpa in, about having people who were actually there.
So you can play with the details and some minor point about the fact that you have a meeting happening on a certain date, but you miss the big picture. It was being set up in a particular way to have Mr. Bramley, if you choose, and Mr. Jaccard, but to have others as well.
So if you want to go bullheadedly ahead and have a meeting on a particular day, yes, you wanted one side of the motion, a particular part of the motion, but you're not honouring the full intent of the motion. The more important, bigger-picture part is to say that we want to get some balance here, some direct input from people who were at the G-8.
You can kind of proceed and say, well, we kind of—