Yes, and we don't have anything else to do either.
The concern I have is...let's go back to the last meeting we had. Here we were in a meeting where we funnelled two sets of witnesses through. We had a two-minute question period and then we had a one-minute question period, and when I look at the validity of what we're going to be talking about, whether we're talking with these witnesses here today, Mr. Chair, or whether we're even able to get in contact with the people through teleconference or able to find phone numbers for them.... You look at a G-8 meeting, which was months and months and months in the planning, with tremendous execution issues and a tremendous number of lessons learned, and here we are going to try to bundle this all up in 25 minutes.
We're going to have some kind of testimony, and we'll probably allow them each 10 minutes to discuss it, and then we're going to have a concept where we're going to talk about the G-8 in a matter of 20 minutes. Mr. Chair, anybody on this committee I think would be irresponsible to think we would be able to come in with a qualified opinion on that issue in that period of time. I don't understand why we would even be entertaining that at this point in time, and that's why this motion is completely irresponsible for us to do as parliamentarians. I think what we're looking for here is quite frankly...Mr. McGuinty is looking for a one-minute sound bite that he can ask in question period this afternoon, and I think that's virtually what it is.