Well, I think the overall objective of all the major parties in the G8 was to keep the U.S. in the tent. That was the overriding objective. Although it came at a bit of a price, particularly for those who wanted to have some specific targets set by the mid-century, at least that ultimate objective of keeping the U.S. in the tent and also the U.S. talking about the consideration of reduction targets needs to be appreciated for the accomplishment it is.
The one thing, for example, that I would really take, not necessarily exception to, but clarification with is Dr. Jaccard's comment about how he's seen these kinds of statements before. We've never seen these kinds of statements before from the Bush administration. We saw them before from the Clinton administration when they were part of the G8 process, but not from the Bush administration. Even though the Bush administration did not give a specific commitment to a numbered target for 2050, the fact that it did talk about actually participating in a regime where such a target would be the subject of negotiation did meet the minimum requirements that I think most people were hoping to get out of it.