The context will determine how that might happen. There are some examples of different provincial legislation that have features of precaution within them, even if that word isn't used. That's why I was trying to say that what is less important than the particular meaning is what the points are within the process that we can insert to make the act more precautionary. I have tried to identify some of those.
Certainly while one articulation of the precautionary principle may be stronger than another, and it may be nice to have it in one provincial act and not in another federal act, the real key is that it is not one-stop shopping. There have to be a number of places where precaution is there in a mandatory and a clear way to address, for example, those discretionary points of implementation that we would want to address.
That is what my introductory remarks were intended to make the case for. We would be happy to elaborate on those for all the different stages, particularly part 5 of the act, throughout the process.