Maybe it's a yes or no question.
I guess the first question is whether CEPA would be improved and more useful if the precautionary principle were an automatic legal requirement rather than a discretionary power in the act. That's the first question. And I guess the second question is whether the precautionary principle could be usefully incorporated—and I thought I heard maybe a positive answer to this—into some of the specific mechanisms of the act. I'm thinking of virtual elimination of PBITs or the phasing out of known carcinogens. Would something be gained by both of those things?