What's important for committee members to be considering, whether or not it's being officially popped around in Environment Canada, is that this is one of the debates that industry certainly brings to the table and it has to be explored by this group to understand what it means.
In the application the smoking debate or analogy is important. Carbon dioxide is coming into our debate in this forum and committee. I wonder if any of the panellists have any comment on the use of the proper application of the precautionary principle when applied to carbon dioxide, which is named as a toxin, quite controversially, under CEPA.