Before we hear another piece, this notion of sound science seems to be placed...not in opposition, but seeking to have a criteria level that seems almost impossible to meet. Could people explain that a little more?
A lot of business groups will say they're all for the precautionary principle; it sounds great. Just use science--number one--and cost effectiveness--number two--in your application. In the Canadian experience, I would suggest that has been an abject failure in terms of protecting Canadians from some of the most critical harmful substances. Could I get a comment?