I've been an observer, not a member of government, for a long time, and I don't think you see a lot of manipulation. I think the issue with respect to changing governments, if I may--and Mr. Glover has spoken of this in a number of cases--has to do with the level of emphasis given to monitoring and reporting, and that is variable.
There are certain things that must be done under the act. We must assess and respond to the substance notifications. We must work our way through the categorization exercise. We must do PSL assessments in a certain period of time. We may do a bunch of other things, including science monitoring and reporting. Even if we must do reporting, how much do we have to do? If we must do monitoring, how much must we do? That, I think, is where you can see a degree of variability through the years.