I can jump in. I'm not advocating nuclear. In fact, if one tumbles the numbers, nuclear is a very high-cost policy option, but it is being actively contemplated in the country.
I think for the carbon prices, nuclear becomes competitive, but there are all kinds of reductions below that, and we should go after them first. Simply being very lumpy with our policy--by which I mean picking winners--is probably not a least-cost option. We may solve the problem with a bunch of nuclear facilities fairly easily, but that may not be cost-effective.
Nuclear is not the answer.