I certainly took those points into account, but I was primarily influenced by the majority judgment and the manner in which the majority basically set out a road map for establishing the constitutionality of CEPA based on the criminal law power--an exercise that I think was expanded in the firearms reference about four years later. So I pretty much took my template from the majority decisions, notwithstanding the fact that there was dissent in the case of Hydro-Québec.
