Let me stop you just for a moment on that first point, because I looked at that in your testimony. I think today we were seeking testimony with regard to its constitutionality, not the assertive nature of the bill or the aggressive nature of a target that the panellists have brought here today, which is whether the measures being considered are effective. I'll remind some of my government colleagues that some of the measures considered here in this bill were the same measures invoked in the Turning the Corner plan. The same mechanism is being considered. The ambition of the target is actually at question, unless you will provide some experience and knowledge in terms of what is actually required for Canada's goal-setting targets. But I don't believe that's your area of expertise. Am I correct?
