We haven't seen that yet in this presidential election. However, certainly the last time a new president was elected, George Bush had made a campaign promise to deal with carbon dioxide emissions from utilities, from electric generators, and then abandoned that upon coming into office, citing the California energy crisis at the time. We're hopeful that won't happen. There's a lot more evidence on the scientific front. There are a lot more businesses calling for regulatory certainty, who want some kind of comprehensive climate policy. So I'm hoping that's not the case.
The truth is, if that was the Supreme Court position, a cap and trade bill is probably going to be the most effective way to address this. I don't think the companies are really going to want a piecemeal approach that now is clearly, according to the Supreme Court, the law of the land. It's certainly possible. So an EPA could regulate, facility by facility, in a traditional standards-setting approach now under the Supreme Court proclamation, and I think that would be much less cost-effective than the bills we're considering.