Six-three? He says it was five-four.
He goes on to say:
...that “the Act’s true nature is regulatory, not criminal”. But the majority held that the intervention of some administrative discretion did not rob the law of its criminal character. At the end of the day, there was a prohibition and a penalty for the release of toxic substances.
“Speaking for the majority”--Mr. McGuinty will probably know this from memory--was La Forest, and he said “what Parliament is”.... You remember that, right?