For one thing, we will feel a sense of progress toward sustainability. We'll have a sense of and a way to understand whether or not we are making progress. I think that's one of the most important potential impacts of this. I don't think we will say that we have achieved alignment with these fundamental sustainability principles in 20 years; I think it will take longer than that. What we will have is a good sense of where we're trying to get to ultimately and a way to track progress in that direction. That's probably the most important thing.
I can speak from an example on a municipal scale. We've worked a lot with the municipality of Whistler. They're now saying they want their community to be sustainable by 2060. They have a good understanding of what that's going to require with their energy, water, land use, natural environments, built environment, economy, and so on. They have interim targets for 2020 and a plan called Whistler 2020 that has won awards. Now they can evaluate the capital decisions, the large decisions around the Olympics they're making, and how well they're getting closer to the interim targets and their ultimate vision for their community. I think that same sort of principle could apply in this case, but obviously on a different scale.