Let's stay with this for a moment then, because I've seen that type of language written into other pieces of legislation. When looking for direct consequences overall, one of the differences we've seen in the U.K. and other jurisdictions when they have taken an approach similar to this is that people are named in the planning, not just the political heads who are meant to shepherd something through, but those from the public service side of things, from the interdepartmental.... Thus, hopefully--and I think there has been some success to it--there's a feeling that there's some responsibility for failure.
As it is right now—and I'm not looking to you for amendments, but we'll be seeking some—my concern is to actually give that sense across government that not only is this the direction that government seeks and needs to choose, regardless of political stripe in office, but that there are direct and immediate consequences to one's career for failing, for not going across the board and making sure the thing actually happens.