I'm just wondering if the difference between the cleanup of contaminated sites, which you say has been fairly successful, and cleaning up the Great Lakes might not have to do with the fact—and maybe I'm mistaken—that when it comes to remediating contaminated sites, those are federal contaminated sites, are they not? So the federal government has sort of complete control over the process.
You bring up a good point about coordinating government departments, and that's why I've suggested to the government that it create a junior minister for water to coordinate the 20 federal departments and agencies that are involved in these issues—and because the Minister of the Environment, whomever that might be at a particular time, has many other issues to deal with. So you bring up a good point about coordination, and hopefully we'll follow up on your recommendation about inviting the departments.
I think science is a big issue. We've heard that the Department of Environment's capacity to deal with water issues is dismal now because of cuts over the years, and I don't know if that can be addressed by your department.
Lastly, would you plan to do a similar analysis on the St. Lawrence action plan? Or maybe you've done that recently and I'm not aware of it.