Very well, the motion would be debated. At that point, if the House were to adopt the motion, this matter would be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
Given that there is already a filibuster going on in that committee, would that then mean that the Committee would have to first deal with the motion passed in the House of Commons, which would thus suspend the filibuster? Would that become a priority issue to be debated upon by the Committee on Procedure and House Affairs where the government, despite the decision of the House, would nevertheless be able to pursue its filibuster? What I mean to say by that is that our move here today must have some import. That is what I want to know.