I think that's probably going to be a longer discussion.
To take the example you used, in spring 2009 there's going to be a report from the office on Kyoto implementation. That report will look at issues related to the implementation of the existing obligations the federal government has taken in the Kyoto context. The report will not comment on the policies related to that issue. We will look at the extent of the implementation and whether it was done in a way that is credible under the existing obligations.
If there's a broader policy issue related to Kyoto, for example, I'm not an elected official. The policy issues related to the options would go to the members of Parliament and the elected members of government. These are substantive issues related to policy direction.