I'm not sure if the term “national” is actually defined in the bill. The bill is intended to be binding on the federal government, as I understand it. I wouldn't want to try to interpret what the term “national” implies here.
My point was not the use of the term “national”, but rather that the bill as I understand it—and my understanding may not be complete, of course—would suggest there would be goals and has this very prescriptive list at the end where the federal government would use its federal regulatory powers in each of these areas. That naturally would have implications for the provinces, some of whom may have regulation in these areas already. It would depend on the subject. I'm simply saying it would have an impact and potentially some significant implications for them.