Evidence of meeting #35 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendments.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Marie-Andrée Roy  Parliamentary Counsel (Legislation), Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Go ahead, Mr. St-Cyr.

4:25 p.m.

Bloc

Thierry St-Cyr Bloc Jeanne-Le Ber, QC

I have a question concerning the French version that we received of amendment G-15.2. Handwritten notes suggest that “réalisation des cibles” be replaced by “atteindre des cibles“, and that “fiabilité“ be substituted for “fidélité”. Are these handwritten changes part of the version that we would adopt? Or must we adopt the previous version containing no such changes?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

My understanding is that it would be the handwritten amendments we would be voting on. Am I correct, Mr. Warawa?

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

That's correct.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

So it would be the as-corrected version of the French version.

Are there any other comments on amendment G-15.2?

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

We now need to come back to clause 18 as amended.

(Clause 18 as amended agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Go ahead, Mr. Warawa.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

I don't think we sought unanimous consent to go back to clause 11. There was a “not” that has to go into that one. If you could seek that, it's another item we could check off.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

We have a correction, as I understand it, to clause 11. Do we have permission to go back and reopen clause 11?

4:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yes.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

(On clause 11--Departmental Sustainable Development Strategies)

Go ahead on clause 11, Mr. Warawa.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

In clause 3, after the word “agency”, there should be inserted the word “not”. After “To the Financial Administration Act, or agency”, insert “not”. “Not” needs to be inserted.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Which line are you on?

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

This is in clause 3 in the third line, after the word “agency”. In between “agency” and “named”, insert “not”.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Is everyone following that? This is an amendment.

Subclause 11(3) would read as follows:

The Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of a minister presiding over a department not named in Schedule 1 to the Financial Administration Act, or agency not named in Schedule 2 of this Act

So we're simply adding a “not” to “named in Schedule 2 of this Act”. Then it would continue:

direct that the requirements of subsections (1) and (2) apply in respect of the department or agencies.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

I think maybe some of the confusion occurred because I was saying “clause 3”. It's actually subclause 11(3). That may be where some confusion was. Did everybody find that?

4:30 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Looking at clause 11 and the amendments that were brought before, I have subclauses 11(1) and 11(2). Maybe Mr. Warawa can point to a subclause 11(3) in the amendments, just so we're working from the same text.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

Clause 11 as amended had four subsections.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

I have a copy of that in which I have it listed as amendment 14.1. The clerk just explained that this was introduced.

4:30 p.m.

Bloc

Bernard Bigras Bloc Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC

What is the number of the amendment to which the parliamentary secretary is referring? Has an amendment been tabled, yes or no?

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

John Godfrey Liberal Don Valley West, ON

It's a Conservative government amendment. Does it have a number?

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

Apparently they weren't all distributed. We're going to get copies made right now to see where that “not” goes.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

Do we want to stand this?

(Clause 11 allowed to stand)

4:30 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

I found an old version of this in English. I've given it to the Bloc. I see the text we're working from now, so I don't need the time.

Perhaps my colleagues from the Bloc—

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Bob Mills

I think it's only fair to Mr. Bigras that he has it in front of him. So let's get copies.

Next is amendment L-21.