Thank you. This is very interesting.
About a year ago I went up and visited my good friend, the hard-working member of Parliament for Fort McMurray—Athabasca, and had a tour of the river. I was fascinated to actually see rocks with bitumen oozing out of them right along the shore of the river. So it's there naturally too, and to now see this resource being used is very interesting.
I also saw some areas that looked as though they had been reclaimed, different from what they were originally. Of course I think the bison had been returned to that area too.
My question is on water recovery. You had mentioned that with the surface mining it's about 70%, and it's about 90% with in situ. So with the projected trend as we move more to in situ and away from surface mining, because that's where the big resources are, deeper than the 75 metres, will just that formula alone cause the amount of water that's being used to likely go down, then?