But how do you explain that a Federal Court justice would make such a ruling? You tell us that the agency's role is to be the watchdog of the process. That is what you told us. You also said on three occasions that the issue of climate change was a challenge.
Tell us why there was this Federal Court ruling. Is there a problem in the process? I understand when you say there are no regulations—you said it and I can understand that—but there have been some problems with the review of this project as regards the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.
What I understand as well is that following the Federal Court decision, the project was sent back to the federal-provincial committee for authorization to complete it.
First of all, are you on this federal-provincial committee? And what argument did the proponent put forward to ensure that it will meet the Federal Court's requirements?