I think I'm moving in approximately the same direction as Mr. Christopherson, but I think it makes sense for the Bali session to be held as number two. I suspect we probably won't be meeting a week today, given the reality of life around here, so our first session back ought to be a debriefing.
I think it would be very interesting to hear from people who are obviously considered eminent enough by the government to take the place of parliamentarians—I thought I'd get that in—rather than having us go. If they're eminent enough to take along as part of the official delegation, I think they're eminent enough to give us their views on what they learned. I think there may be nuances or colourings that will then help us in our subsequent work on the second, third, fourth, and fifth sessions.
What I also think, Chair, is that because we have time, in the sense that we won't be getting back to this until late January or early February, it would be perhaps useful to call a meeting at some point—maybe even a teleconference, or something like that—of the steering committee, so that the horse trading, or whatever needs to be done on the content and suggestions of names for balance here, can be agreed to with everybody participating, and so that there's no wondering, why did you leave off X? It's also so that nobody can then question, in the meeting of the whole, why we've done what we've done. I think that would strengthen your hand.
So those are my two suggestions: to move Bali up to number two, as the first thing when we come back; and then to have a steering committee meeting—I guess with Mr. Regan and others—to hash out the list.