I find the parliamentary secretary's argument somewhat funny and paradoxical, because he has a whole battery of public officials to look at their motions. We are being told that this leaves us little time to assess the significance of motions. If the opposition is able to do this, I don't see why the government would not have the time and the means to do so.
I think that this rule has generally worked well in the past, unless my opposition colleagues contradict me. So I fail to understand Mr. Warawa's argument. Perhaps he could explain it to us. He has at his disposal a whole battery of public servants and advisors. Time is not the strongest argument in favour of the motion he is making.