What concerns me is the 48 hours straight. In other words, if a motion is tabled at 6 p.m. on Monday evening, it cannot be studied the next day or even on the Wednesday. So that means a two-day delay. Furthermore, if the motion is tabled on Tuesday evening, it cannot be considered until the following week because of when the committee sits, meaning Tuesday and Thursday mornings, so two days apart. This brings us to the following week. That is too long. This means that a motion tabled at the beginning or the middle of the week can only be considered the following week, and events may have changed. So I think that 24 hours' notice is more realistic, to ensure timeliness and relevancy.
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.